Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2011 11:53 pm
Posts: 103
I believe there may be at least 3 DNA groups from ayrshire from before 1600
We have the Greenholm branch
see Branches of the NN families on this forum for chart for NN of Greenholm (DNA group3)


Sun May 13, 2012 9:09 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2011 11:53 pm
Posts: 103
I have no idea who this Sir Thomas is
-where he came from
but he did live in Maybole Ayrshire in 1597
Quote:
Sir Thomas Nisbet Maybole
Domestic Annals of Scotland
Reign of James VI. 1591 - 1603 Part C
Jan 1 1597
Jan 1
On the evening of the 1st of January, Sir Thomas Kennedy supped with Sir Thomas Nisbet in the house of the latter at Maybole.The Lairds of Auchindrain and Dunduff, with a few servants, lay in wait for him in the yard, and when he came forth to go to his own house to bed, they fired their pistols at him. ‘He being safe of any hurt therewith, and perceiving them with their swords most cruelly to pursue his life was forced for his safety to fly; in which chase they did approach him so near, as he had undoubtedly been overta’en and killed, if he had not adventured to run aside and cover himself with the ruins of ane decayed house; whilk, in respect of the darkness of the night, they did not perceive; but still followed to his lodging, and searched all the corners thereof, till the confluence of the people . . . . forced them to retire.’
For this assault, Sir Thomas Kennedy pursued at law the Lairds of Auchindrain aud Dunduff, and was so far successful that Dunduff had to retire into England, while ‘Colzean gat the house of Auchindrain, and destroyit the . . . . plenishing, and wrackit all the garden. And also they made mony sets [snares] to have gotten [Auchindrain] himself; but God preservit him from their tyranny.' Auchindrain, however, was forced ‘to cover malice by show of repentance, and for satisfaction of his by-past offence, and gage of his future duty, to offer his eldest son in marriage to Sir Thomas Kennedy’s dochter; whilk, by intercession of friends, [was] accepted.’
We shall hear more of this feud hereafter (see under December 11, 1601).


Sun May 13, 2012 9:15 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 2 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: